Media law teaches us that defamation is the communication of a false statement stated as a fact. Without sufficient evidence, this is considered slander or libel or even a malicious attack on an individual such as a minister in the given example. As a journalist and a television producer, it is my sole job to report the truth and guarantee the reporters and fellow producers under me do the same. While the video feed given to me by an unaccredited witness and source is tempting, it is not worth losing my job over. However, there are several ways you can handle this without implying questionable intentions:
1. I could bring the video to the attention of my editor or managing editor. Their likely response will be, ”Who is the source and are they credible?”
2. Use the video without seeking permission or advice from an editor and run the risk of being sued.
3. Ignore the email but thank your friend for the information.
The answer I would select is 1. Just because you are a producer for a television network, does not mean you are without merit to seek the counsel of a higher individual. Perhaps someone has dealt with this dilemma before and knows the right way around it.
Unfortunately, there is not always someone around to help immediately so sometimes you have to think on your toes which is why you are a television producer in the first place. It is possible your friend could be considered a citizen journalist and videos from cell phones are a popular source of information today.
The trick is to weight your options. The likelihood that this video is framing the minister and making him look guilty is very high and it is ALWAYS necessary to get a quote from the accused before printing or airing it. If someone out scoops your station, think to yourself it may have been worth it to avoid a lawsuit.
